Friday, February 17, 2012

Eli Manning?s ?athletic amnesia? set him apart early on

No matter the sport, those who wish to succeed over a long period of time must develop what I would call "athletic amnesia" -- the ability to learn from one's mistakes at the same time you avoid the mental and emotional backlash than can happen if you take those mistakes to heart�too often. In the NFL, quarterbacks and cornerbacks really have to have that amnesia -- when you throw a pick, or when you get burned by a receiver, you have to stick that in your back pocket and move on. The game moves far too quickly; if you're busy pouting, it will pass you by.

In his first postseason MMQB column of 2012, SI.com's �Peter King looks back through a 10-year history of scouting notes, game recaps, and quotes from the man himself in an attempt to get to the heart of Eli Manning's character. What is it about this particular quarterback that drives him to come up big in the biggest moments, when those with even more talent than his will falter under pressure?

As King recalls, you can trace the "clutchiness" back to a 2002 game between Eli's Ole Miss team and Jason Campbell's heavily favored Auburn Tigers.

A couple of days later, [New York Giants then-GM Ernie] Accorsi types his report in all capital letters to be submitted as part of the team's scouting report on Manning. In a section of the report covering the second half, he writes: "NEVER GETS RATTLED. RALLIED HIS TEAM FROM A 14-3 HALFTIME DEFICIT BASICALLY ALL BY HIMSELF. LED THEM ON TWO SUCCESSIVE THIRD QUARTER DRIVES TO GO AHEAD, 17-16. THE FIRST TOUCHDOWN, ON A 40-YARD STREAK DOWN THE LEFT SIDELINE, HE DROPPED THE BALL OVER THE RECEIVER'S RIGHT SHOULDER. CALLED THE NEXT TOUCHDOWN PASS HIMSELF, CHECKING OFF TO A 12-YARD SLANT. MAKES A LOT OF DECISIONS ON PLAY CALLS AT THE LINE OF SCRIMMAGE.''

That was the first clue for the Giants. In the same way that Bill Walsh leaned fairly heavily on a series of Notre Dame comeback victories in 1978 when evaluating Joe Montana, Accorsi knew the importance of this game. Clearly, it factored heavily in the Giants' decision to trade up with the San Diego Chargers in the 2004 draft and make Eli their future. He didn't care what had happened before to put him in that hole -- all the young quarterback was thinking about was how to right the ship.

Fast-forward in King's piece to Eli's rookie year, and a nationally televised game against the Pittsburgh Steelers, and a fellow first-year quarterback named Ben Roethlisberger. Eli was coming off a series of disastrous games, especially a loss to the Baltimore Ravens in which the Ravens made him look like a high school backup.

Did Eli pout? Nope. Did he beat himself up publicly, as some of your dumber coaches would prefer their players do when they screw up? Not at all.


Two hours after the Ravens game, Eli had turned on the amnesia for everything but the things that would allow him to learn.

On the two-hour ride to Newark, Manning spoke with Gilbride and then-offensive coordinator John Hufnagel. Rather than sulk about the disastrous game he'd played, he told them his eight favorite plays. He told them, "If you could put these in the game plan next week, it'd give me eight plays I'd be comfortable with -- rhythm plays, plays I know I'd have an open receiver even if it was just a short gain.''

Notable that Manning could think about the next game 90 minutes after the most embarrassing game of his life. "I was down, really down,'' he said. "But I knew if we could put some plays in the plan for the next week that I liked, I'd feel better about it -- and the offense would see in practice we'd be able to move the ball.''

The Giants lost a 33-30 thriller that day, but that's where it really started. And that's why Eli Manning is able to zero in when the moment demands it. He keeps just enough from his mistakes to learn from them, and he throws the rest away to avoid all that baggage.

It's a pretty good lesson for all of us.

Source: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/eli-manning-athletic-amnesia-set-him-apart-early-163057740.html

Domata Peko Corey Peters

Champions League malaise gives Premier League cause for concern | Daniel Taylor

Arsenal's thrashing by Milan leaves English football potentially facing its worst European Cup performance in 16 years

Perhaps the most damning assessment came from Arrigo Sacchi, the man who created possibly the finest Milan team in history. Sacchi had already used his "Sopra La Panca" column in Wednesday's Gazzetta dello Sport to say this was the worst Arsenal team for a decade but, after seeing them close-up, he wanted to revise his criticisms. "I said 10 years," he told television viewers. "Maybe I was being too generous."

Sacchi, a two-times European Cup winner with the team of Gullit, Van Basten, Rijkaard, Baresi et al, had called it exactly right. Zlatan Ibrahimovic, he predicted, could be "devastating" against a defence this vulnerable.

"Arsenal cannot match Milan for experience, technical quality and individuality. They are not sharp. They do not move as a unit, their defence is slow and not protected by their midfield."

In the past, he said, Ars�ne Wenger's teams played a "fast and brilliant way". The current team was "not fluid" and "still searching for a convincing system".

It was difficult to argue with a single word of it after a night that Wenger described as "our worst in Europe ever". Arsenal's manager has never been particularly good at hiding his distress after bad defeats and it was difficult to remember the last time he looked quite so mortified. No side has ever turned around a four-goal deficit to win a Champions League knockout tie. Arsenal have played 222 times in Europe and never lost so comprehensively. Wenger could hardly maintain eye contact. He was grey.

Yet Sacchi's observations extended further than the current malaise at Arsenal. "Look at the Premier League," he said. "They are a long way behind the two Manchester clubs, both of whom are already out of the Champions League. This just underlines the decline of English football."

The more popular view, certainly in the self-congratulatory Premier League, is that it is actually Italian football that has been regressing. Sacchi, however, had a point. This is threatening to be the first season since 1996 when English football has not been able to provide a single quarter-finalist.

Arsenal's chances rank somewhere between minimal and nonexistent and, though Chelsea will hope to do better when they take on Napoli at the Stadio San Paolo on Tuesday, the dislocation between Andr� Villas-Boas and his increasingly mutinous group of players hardly inspires confidence.

This could probably be written off as a one-off, nothing too potentially serious or long-lasting, if Manchester United had not already been eliminated from a group featuring Basel, Benfica and a Romanian team, Otelul Galati, that Sir Alex Ferguson admitted he had never heard of when the draw was made. Manchester City did manage 10 points from a challenging group featuring Napoli and Bayern Munich, which would ordinarily be enough to qualify, but it still represents a failure given the enormous spending under the ownership of the Abu Dhabi United Group.

Whether this constitutes a genuine decline is difficult to say. A decline usually means a number of years, rather than one bad campaign, and it is not so long ago English football was slapping itself on the back for having provided three of the four semi-finalists in three successive seasons, from 2007 to 2009. United have reached the final in three of the past five campaigns and Arsenal, United and Tottenham have all knocked Milan out of the last 16 in the same period.

What happens with Chelsea next week will give a clearer picture but, for now, Arsenal's lamentable efforts and the sight of the Premier League's top two clubs grubbing around in the Europa League does raise the question of whether everything in the self-acclaimed best league in the world is as good as it is cracked up to be.

Arsenal's performance had been shocking and yet also predictable. The Manchester clubs did not even make it out of the group stages and that leaves English football relying upon a Chelsea team whose deterioration, much like Arsenal's, is close to the point of being staggering. Napoli have already eliminated City and, if they do the same to Chelsea, it will represent the least distinguished performance from English clubs since Blackburn Rovers had a go 16 years ago and demonstrated exactly how not to do it ? David Batty, Graeme Le Saux and all that.


guardian.co.uk © 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2012/feb/16/champions-league-premier-league

Aaron Rodgers Ben Roethlisberger Tony Romo Sage Rosenfels

Kevin Pietersen is England's greatest modern batsman ? flaws and all | Barney Ronay

KP's record is dizzyingly fine, the last of the high-water-mark 2005 Ashes team still playing in all formats of the game

This week I went to the kind of sporting sub?event that puts you in mind, rather uneasily, of the old joke about being the type of person who turns up to the opening of an envelope, or the launch of a rubber dinghy, or the unfoiling of a Pot Noodle.

In this case it was the unveiling of a shirt: not just any shirt, but the one Kevin Pietersen will wear for his new IPL franchise, the Delhi Daredevils. The shirt's coming-out was staged at the ICC cricket academy in Dubai and was a spectacle that, it must be said, required a certain amount of politicking to witness. Initially English press were banned from attending. This shirt launch was simply too big, too thickly caked in event-glamour.

Then a twist: English journalists could attend, but they must not ask questions. They may look upon the shirt, but only in the role of penitent mutes, struck dumb by its splendour. And so it was that after a tantalising delay, flanked by a cartel of grinning bigwigs, Pietersen finally appeared decked out in full Daredevils get-up, as ever surprisingly tall and lean and tanned and goofily charismatic.

We'd come not to bury KP, but perhaps to smile a little and to draw arch analogies between his recent travails in 50-over cricket and this knee?trembling Twenty20 canonisation. But as he ran through his lines, doing really rather well, name-checking the right people, posing for a photo with all four attendant bigwigs clutching at a single corner of the shirt, as though it were some holy healing shroud, it was hard not to soften and feel a little proud of this most peculiar cricketing personage.

This is the thing about Pietersen. You may think you have the measure of him, but for all his enduring celebrity-ism he remains both appealing and surprisingly persistent. It is perhaps only when he is finally gone that we may feel he has been slightly underrated, rather than, as many would suggest, the opposite.

Naturally, none of the attendant shirt-launch shenanigans were actually Pietersen's fault. He is simply the product here, retailed aggressively by his time-share owners. Plus, he fits this world so well it is tempting to imagine he harbours ambitions of becoming soon a facsimile of Chris Gayle, the world's most post-modern cricketer, who has basically pared himself down into a hired global six-hitting machine: just dial the 24-hour emergency number and Gayle will emerge from the nearest disco carrying his baseball bat.

But we know Pietersen better than this by now. The fact is, he hasn't disappeared from view, hasn't shied from difficult times in 50-over cricket, but has instead embraced his reinvention as an opening batsman at precisely the moment in his career he seems least equipped for its demands.

Many have remarked on the technical flaw in a defence that sees him present his bat with a dramatic swish from the right, like a matador brandishing his cloak. And there is something epically poignant about Pietersen being humbled by the forward defensive, this telescopicallyassembled uber-athlete with his nylon warrior's gait, baffled by cricket's ancient first position, like Tarzan starving to death because he just can't hold his knife and fork properly.

Some see this as symptomatic of a fatal flaw, a hubristic failure to refine and adapt his kung-fu forward lunge. Some will say he has always had a flawed technique, relying instead on those astronaut's reflexes. But this overlooks his fervent dedication to practice. Frail, ungrooved techniques are for lazier players. Instead Pietersen is simply

at a time when he is suffering chronic uncertainty at the crease, induced by the brutal new world of UDRS with its unblinking pedant's eye for lbw.

It is a system that has on certain pitches made cricket into a game of lbw, turned pads into stumps and cricket into french-cricket, stumps and bails a backdrop to the real G-spot, the batsman's legs.

Pietersen has not yet rebuilt his batting to counter this assault on the shins. Will he be given time? Certainly there is no real pillow of enduring public affection to sustain him through the lean times. Instead, Pietersen is often viewed a bit like a piece of machinery bought in at great expense: when he doesn't work he seems suddenly useless, like a combine harvester with a broken axle. This is despite the fact that his career record is not just fine, but dizzyingly fine. In ODIs Pietersen has the highest batting average of any England player with more than 50 matches. He is England's greatest player yet in Twenty20. And only Ken Barrington and Wally Hammond have played as many Tests and had a higher batting average. Forget for a moment comparing attacks across the ages. Judged solely on his stats, Pietersen is England's greatest batsman of the modern age.

His value lies in intangibles, too. Few other sportsmen have provided such distinctive and memorable physicality: that bravura forearm-extension to meet the clouting cover drive, or the quick step and loft over midwicket he produced on Wednesday night off the bowling of Abdur Rehman.

Then there are the innings: the 158 at The Oval in 2005 will remain his most dizzying extreme, an innings of fearless skunk?haired dufus-genius. Since then there have been more rhythmic masterpieces ? and this is the lovely paradox about Pietersen. He may have been painted as brash and new world?ish, a twitching future?phile. But it is his Test match deeds that will endure.

Plus, he has the added lustre of having simply not gone away, the last of the high-water-mark 2005 England team still playing in all formats. For two years now he is supposed to have been on the wane, already engaged in the roadrunner years, that modern sporting phenomenon where from a distance it is clear you've already gone skittering out over the edge of the cliff, held up by nothing more than fame-momentum and celebrity ballast. But Pietersen is dogged as well as explosive, as all great sportsmen are. And beneath the excitingly zippered, multi?chevroned inanities of his latest act of shirt-shifting, this is still a truly great English cricketer.


guardian.co.uk © 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/blog/2012/feb/17/kevin-pietersen-england-delhi-daredevils-ipl

Chris Massey Ryan Mathews Reagan Mauia Le Ron McClain

Roddy White isn?t thrilled with Roger Goodell?s $20 million salary

It probably won't surprise you to learn that Roger Goodell makes a lot of money, but you might be surprised at just how much. Pro Football Talk ran an item Monday saying that Roger Goodell, by 2019, will be making $20 million a year.

If that figure seems high to you, you're not alone. Atlanta Falcons wide receiver Roddy White is not on board with Goodell's salary. He fired off a bunch of tweets about it, which I've compiled here and edited as best I could for purposes of readability. Here's Roddy:

How in the hell can you pay a man this much money, that can't run or tackle or catch? Roger Goodell is getting over, never seen anything like it, 20 million for looking over the league with tremendous help. I guess the NFL is banking. The NFL is not a company, it's a nonprofit organization that makes a lot of profit.

I'm not into arguing who is and isn't overpaid. I mean, it's a free-market economy, and if you can generate revenue, then you get paid. Yes, we end up with linebackers making 370 times the salary of a school teacher, and that's obscene, but that's capitalism. I know that no one is suggesting socialism as an alternative.

The same system that allows Roger Goodell to make $20 million a year is the same system that allows Roddy White to sign a six-year deal worth $48 million. Who's overpaid? The guy making $20 million who wears a suit and makes decisions in board rooms, or the guy who wears a helmet and catches oblong pigskins?

I offer no answer of my own. I just hope both men are able to find peace with themselves and their salaries while driving around in their Bentleys.

Gracias, PFT.

Other popular content on the Yahoo! network:
? How Allen Iverson blew through his $154M NBA career fortune
? Soccer player causes stir with sexist Valentine's Day picture
? A shameless businessman wants to patent 'Linsanity'
? GrindTV: Diver frees entangled orca crying for help

Source: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/roddy-white-isn-t-thrilled-roger-goodell-20-215348299.html

Aaron Rodgers Ben Roethlisberger Tony Romo Sage Rosenfels

Celtics Vs. Bulls: Bulls Down Celtics, 89-80

Source: http://www.sbnation.com/nba/2012/2/16/2803901/celtics-vs-bulls-bulls-down-celtics-89-80

Colt McCoy Stephen McGee Donovan McNabb Matt Moore

Thursday, February 16, 2012

Could concussions actually kill football?

-- If the sport of football ever dies, it will die from the outside in. -- Jonah Lehrer

If an increasing number of economists and trend analysts are to be believed, we may one day look back at something like Colt McCoy's concussion against the Pittsburgh Steelers in 2011 as one of many galvanic events that blew football apart, and reduced the country's most popular sport to a marginal pastime. It's unlikely that such a colossal financial concern as football could be killed off entirely, but as Malcolm Gladwell first wrote in the New Yorker in 2009, it's not crazy to think that an increasing number of player concussions -- and the NFL's real lack of concern about those injuries despite its public face -- could have Americans looking at football very differently down the road.

Gladwell's article, which compared football to dogfighting and revealed some truly horrifying information about the effects of concussions on the minds and bodies of football players (even more than has already been revealed through other outlets), was dismissed in most football circles as the nerdy ramblings of a weird-haired Englishman who doesn't understand the game. But Gladwell understood the common threads of different competitive dangers well enough to make some interesting connections.

In one way or another, plenty of organizations select for gameness. The Marine Corps does so, and so does medicine, when it puts young doctors through the exhausting rigors of residency. But those who select for gameness have a responsibility not to abuse that trust: if you have men in your charge who would jump off a cliff for you, you cannot march them to the edge of the cliff?and dogfighting fails this test. Gameness, Carl Semencic argues, in "The World of Fighting Dogs" (1984), is no more than a dog's "desire to please an owner at any expense to itself."

Okay -- that's one, and football fits that suit to a degree. But let's pass Gladwell by and look at two articles recently written for Grantland, ESPN's "boutique" website. A piece by Jonah Lehrer, entitled "The Fragile Teenage Brain" and quoted above, reported estimates indicating that up to two million football players, from the high school level up, suffer concussions every season -- and those are the concussions that are actually reported. For those unaware of what those concussions can do to kids, Lehrer lays it all out.

In 2002, a team of neurologists surveying several hundred high school football players concluded that athletes who had suffered three or more concussions were nearly ten times more likely to exhibit multiple "abnormal" responses to head injury, including loss of consciousness and persistent amnesia. A 2004 study, meanwhile, revealed that football players with multiple concussions were 7.7 times more likely to experience a "major drop in memory performance" and that three months after a concussion they continued to experience "persistent deficits in processing complex visual stimuli." What's most disturbing, perhaps, is that these cognitive deficits have a real-world impact: When compared with similar students without a history of concussions, athletes with two or more brain injuries demonstrate statistically significant lower grade-point averages.

At the NFL level, there are dangling issues still unresolved. Colt McCoy's concussion is perhaps paramount among them because of the obvious nature of the injury, the team's initial reluctance to diagnose it, and the league's lukewarm reaction to the idea that McCoy had suffered a head injury at all. From our initial report of the incident, when McCoy was knocked into another zip code by Pittsburgh Steelers linebacker James Harrison in early December:

When Harrison�led with his helmet into McCoy's facemask in the fourth quarter of that game, McCoy left the game for just two plays before returning to action. Hidden in that narrative was what happened to McCoy when he came back in the game ? it was clear that the kid got his bell rung pretty good, and that's where the story becomes confusing.

After the game, McCoy�told reporters that he couldn't remember the hit, but Browns coach Pat Shurmur said that McCoy was "fine to go back in." After the game, the media was asked to turn the lights off in their cameras. Why? Well, sensitivity to light is one of the most obvious concussion symptoms.

More germane to this story was the reaction of McCoy's father, Brad, a longtime high school coach in Texas.

"I talked to Colt this morning and he said, 'Dad, I don't know what happened, but I know I lost the game. I know I let the team down. What happened?'

"He never should've gone back in the game," the elder McCoy continued. "He was basically out [cold] after the hit. You could tell by the ridigity of his body as he was laying there. There were a lot of easy symptoms that should've told them he had a concussion. He was nauseated and he didn't know who he was. From what I could see, they didn't test him for a concussion on the sidelines. They looked at his [left] hand.''

Now, think about that. If a high school coach is outraged about the treatment of his son at the hands of the NFL, how do you think the "average" parent is going to feel about letting his or her child play at a level where finances dictate a less stringent series of protocols?

[Related --�Brain Trauma And The Future Of Youth Football In America]

The second article for Grantland on this subject, written by Tyler Cowen and Kevin Grier, and entitled, "What Would the End of Football Look Like?" brings the concept of liability into the equation. Picture a large subset of schools already in hock from a budget standpoint, and imagine how easy it would be for many of those schools to drop football altogether if the financial risks outweigh the potential rewards.

The most plausible route to the death of football starts with liability suits.�Precollegiate football is already sustaining 90,000 or more concussions each year. If ex-players start winning judgments, insurance companies might cease to insure colleges and high schools against football-related lawsuits. Coaches, team physicians, and referees would become increasingly nervous about their financial exposure in our litigious society. If you are coaching a high school football team, or refereeing a game as a volunteer, it is sobering to think that you could be hit with a $2 million lawsuit at any point in time. A lot of people will see it as easier to just stay away.

More and more modern parents will keep their kids out of playing football, and there tends to be a "contagion effect" with such decisions; once some parents have second thoughts, many others follow suit. We have seen such domino effects with the risks of smoking or driving without seatbelts, two unsafe practices that were common in the 1960s but are much rarer today. The end result is that the NFL's feeder system would dry up and advertisers and networks would shy away from associating with the league, owing to adverse publicity and some chance of being named as co-defendants in future lawsuits.

Now, there are some slightly unrealistic Armageddon scenarios in the piece written by Cowen and Grier, as intriguing as the article is. Their contention that Napster was eventually brought down by legal constraint fails to recognize that file-sharing is far more common now than it was a decade ago, due primarily to the number of sites employing servers in areas of the world where the rules don't seem to apply. And businesses die all the time without any lack of moral imperative behind the losses.

That said, the hypothetical presented by the authors isn't entirely nuts if a series of dominoes fall entirely the wrong way.

This slow death march could easily take 10 to 15 years. Imagine the timeline. A couple more college players ? or worse, high schoolers ? commit suicide with autopsies showing CTE. A jury makes a huge award of $20 million to a family. A class-action suit shapes up with real legs, the NFL keeps changing its rules, but it turns out that less than concussion levels of constant head contact still produce CTE. Technological solutions (new helmets, pads) are tried and they fail to solve the problem. Soon high schools decide it isn't worth it. The Ivy League quits football, then California shuts down its participation, busting up the Pac-12. Then the Big Ten calls it quits, followed by the East Coast schools. Now it's mainly a regional sport in the southeast and Texas/Oklahoma.

It's just as easy to put forth the proposition that colleges, starting with the small and less profitable, would bail from the game if lawsuits were the new loss leaders. And at the NFL level, there are an increasing number of suits against a league still reluctant to admit that it willfully ignored �the effects of head injuries far too long despite an avalanche of data proving the long-term effects.

At this point, the NFL faces at least 20 separate concussion lawsuits by former players who say they were misrepresented. And some of those plaintiffs have combined to make their efforts more formidable.

The language on either side is fairly boilerplate. The players allege that the NFL knowingly lagged behind in concussion awareness for the financial betterment of the game without a thought to the personal consequences. The league, led by well-paid mouthpiece Roger Goodell, maintains that such awareness has always been a league priority.

Colt McCoy and his father, two men who have been bonded by the game throughout their lives, would most likely disagree.

Isaac Asimov once told Howard Cosell that in his opinion, robot players would one day replace humans in football. If the nightmare scenarios recently painted come true someday, we may look upon Asimov's option as a most appealing saving grace.

Source: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/could-concussions-actually-kill-football-195407804.html

Ben Roethlisberger Tony Romo Sage Rosenfels Matt Ryan

ANIMATED: Joakim Noah Is Still Doing The Pistol Dance

Source: http://www.sbnation.com/nba/2012/2/16/2803844/joakim-noah-pistol-gif

Derrick Ward Danny Ware Leon Washington Beanie Wells

Measles patient may have exposed others at Super Bowl Village

Well, this isn't good. The Associated Press reports that at least one measles patient may have exposed others to the disease during Super Bowl week at Indianapolis' fan village outposts -- this according to Indiana health officials. Based on different estimates, anywhere from 100,000 to a quarter-million people went through the Super Bowl Village and NFL Experience setups per day in the days leading up to the big game.

Two cases of measles have been confirmed in Hamilton County, and another two have been suspected in Boone County. According to the report, one of the confirmed patients visited the Super Bowl Village on the Friday before the game, though that person didn't visit the NFL Experience exhibit, which was in the Indiana Convention Center.

So, if you were there and are now thinking that you might have walked away from the Village with more than a hangover or a couple bruises from a "friendly fight," here's what to watch for:

Measles symptoms start with a progressively worsening cold and fever and end with a blotchy full-body rash. Serious complications can include meningitis and pneumonia.

Indiana State Health Commissioner Greg Larkin told the AP that between those people who have been immunized during their lifetimes and those who were exposed to measles when they were kids, the odds of an epic outbreak are relatively small.

"We've got high percentages and great rates of childhood immunization," Larkin said. "Also, people born before 1957 are considered naturally immune because they were likely exposed to the virus during childhood."

That said, if you're starting to feel as if this is a bit more than what happens during cold and flu season, you should get yourself checked out.

"Even if you don't have symptoms, it's a reminder to make sure all your immunizations are up to date," [Larkin] said. "And, it's a reminder to wash your hands and stay home from work if you're feeling sick."

Indeed. And as we'll be ramping up Shutdown Corner's draft coverage from the scouting combine in Indy two weeks from today, let's hope this is merely a minor malfunction.

Related Super Bowl content from Yahoo! Sports:

Source: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/measles-patient-may-exposed-others-super-bowl-village-150906790.html

Tommy Kelly Maake Kemoeatu Jimmy Kennedy Terrance Knighton

Giants to be honored with commemorative NY license plate; some would rather see a 9/11 plate

If you're a New York driver, you will be able to get a handsome license plate honoring the 2012 Super Bowl champion New York Giants. There is currently no option, though, for you to get a license plate honoring victims and first responders of the September 11, 2001 tragedy.

This has some New York residents and politicians unhappy. Jim Tedisco, a Republican New York State assemblyman, had this to say. Via the AP:

"I'm happy that the Giants won the Super Bowl as much as the next New Yorker, but who are the real heroes our state should first be celebrating with distinctive plates, the athletes on the gridiron or the first responders and the people who lost their lives on Sept. 11?"

If the question is which group of people most deserve respect and praise, obviously, it's the 9/11 victims and first responders. If license plate availability is how you choose to measure how much respect someone's getting, then yes, I'd imagine this would seem like an injustice.

So why can't New York just also make a commemorative 9/11 license plate? Because in 2004, the state issued a moratorium on new license plates because they had over 300 designs in existence. So now, they can't make any new ones. This Giants plate slides past because they say it's a reworking of a past plate that honored a previous Giants Super Bowl win.

I'm all for honoring 9/11 victims and first responders as much as we can, even today, 10 years after the fact. A license plate seems like a trivial issue, though. No one's saying that football players are more valuable than policemen or firemen. If you'd like to have a 9/11 remembrance on your car, I'm pretty sure there are options available for you.

Any time spent railing against a Giants license plate could maybe be better spent volunteering or donating to the causes one finds more important.

Related Super Bowl content from Yahoo! Sports:

Source: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/giants-honored-commemorative-ny-license-plate-rather-see-230202276.html

Jason Wright Albert Young

A.C. Leonard Arrested: Florida Tight End Charged With Domestic Battery

Source: http://www.sbnation.com/ncaa-football/2012/2/16/2802151/ac-leonard-arrested-florida-football

Aaron Rodgers Ben Roethlisberger Tony Romo Sage Rosenfels

Justin Tuck gave out 80 bottles of Johnnie Walker Blue to celebrate Super Bowl

To celebrate the New York Giants' victory in Super Bowl XLVI, defensive end Justin Tuck gave every member of the team an engraved bottle of Johnnie Walker Blue.

The New York Post reports that Tuck handed out 80 bottles to teammates, coaches and staff on Tuesday morning before the team's victory parade. Each 750-milliliter bottle was engraved with "Super Bowl XLVI champions."�The total cost was $17,600, or $220 per bottle.

"Johnnie Walker is kind of a working man's drink," defensive end Dave Tollefson told the Post.�"Johnnie Walker and some Coke. It just speaks to the attitude of our team and the type of guy he is."

I suppose Johnnie Walker is a working man's drink, if that man works in a corner office on�Wall Street. And though giving the gifts is certainly an indication about the type of guy Tuck is, I don't know if the $220 bottles of booze speak to the Giants' attitude, unless that attitude is of affected Long Island accents and summering on Montauk. (And, I swear, Dave Tollefson, if you ruin the smooth, blended malt perfection that is Johnnie Blue with a splash of Coke, I'll -- well, I'll do nothing because you're 6-foot-4 and weigh 270 pounds. But I'll be greatly upset from a far distance.)

As proud as Tuck was to have won another Super Bowl with the Giants, part of me can't help but think he wouldn't have minded if the team's colors were closer to that of the Arizona Cardinals. Eighty bottles of Johnnie Walker Red would have retailed for around $1,500.

Related Super Bowl content from Yahoo! Sports:

Other popular Super Bowl content:
? Giants' Brandon Jacobs tells tells Gisele Bundchen to 'shut up'
? Tiquan Underwood, cut on Super Bowl eve, is a Patriot again
? Patriots star Wes Welker is butt of 900-pound joke

Source: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/justin-tuck-gave-80-bottles-johnnie-walker-blue-201540583.html

Ron Brace Alan Branch Josh Brent Tony Brown

Bill Belichick wore a hoodie to a golf tournament

Bill Belichick can dress up when he needs to. Despite his affinity for hooded sweatshirts, the New England Patriots coach looks spiffy when he shows up for a Super Bowl press conference or goes to the White House or is out for a night on the town with his special lady friend. One would think that fashion decorum would translate to the golf course. One would think.

Days after the Pats coach lost his second Super Bowl in New England, he was at the AT&T Pebble Beach National Pro-Am wearing a gray sweatshirt on the links. Golf fashion is a bit of a redundancy, but there's a certain decorum one should have when he steps onto the first tee. Kangaroo pockets are not among them.

That's a Pebble Beach sweatshirt, in case you couldn't read the writing. It's like Belichick got to the course, realized it was colder than he thought, walked into the pro shop and asked the guy behind the counter what he could show him in an embroidered hoodie.

This got us thinking: When else does Belichick favor the hoodie? Our investigation, which spans back 25 years, is below.

Source: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/bill-belichick-wore-hoodie-golf-tournament-190644304.html

LaRod Stephens-Howling Jonathan Stewart Tyrell Sutton Naufahu Tahi

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

The hidden play of Super Bowl XLVI: Justin Tuck?s third-quarter sack

Eli Manning's 38-yard pass to Mario Manningham on the New York Giants' game-winning drive late in the fourth quarter is rightly regarded as the play of the game in Super Bowl XLVI -- it was, quite simply, the single-greatest throw this writer has ever seen. But if there was a "1a" play for the Giants, it had to be Justin Tuck's sack of Tom Brady with 6:12 left in the third quarter.

Not only did the third-down takedown stop the Pats from driving when they were still up, 17-12, but Brady re-aggravated his left (non-throwing) shoulder on the play, and backup Brian Hoyer was seen throwing on the sideline during the Giants' corresponding drive.

Before that sack, Brady was on an absolute tear -- he broke Joe Montana's record for consecutive completions in a Super Bowl, and he was 20 of 24 for 201 yards and two touchdowns. After that sack? Try 7 of 17 for 75 yards and the pick by Giants linebacker Chase Blackburn on a deep attempt to tight end Rob Gronkowski.

How much did it affect him? Hard to say -- Brady made a few more errant throws after the play, but the receiver drops were also killers. The famed drop by Wes Welker was a great touch pass that was high but in Welker's hands, and two plays in which Deion Branch ran across the middle and couldn't come up with the ball were also adjustment errors by the receiver.

What happened to the Pats in the last 20 minutes of the game was just as much about the Giants' brilliant defensive adjustments. With full knowledge that New England had no deep threat (they played their safeties shallow through most of the game), the Giants did something they also did in Week 9 when they beat the Pats, 24-20 -- they kept linebackers in the middle of the defense as zone spies to counter Brady's seemingly endless slants, crosses and posts. On Branch's first drop, linebacker Michael Boley was waiting for him just off the middle to Brady's left, and Branch didn't slow up to find the pocket where Brady was throwing.

As our buddy Greg Cosell wrote on the NFL Films blog, Giants defensive coordinator Perry Fewell called this game about as well as any coach possibly could.

So, while it's not clear that correlation equaled causation on the Tuck sack, we do know one thing -- Brady's stats did a total 180 after that play. That's one reason I thought Tuck should have been named the Most Valuable Player of the game ... until Eli Manning uncorked the best throw I've ever seen.

Related Super Bowl content from Yahoo! Sports:

Source: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/hidden-play-super-bowl-xlvi-justin-tuck-third-212201952.html

Anthony Dixon Jonathan Dwyer Heath Evans Jerome Felton

Eagles reportedly will franchise DeSean Jackson, but should they?

Right now, DeSean Jackson is a wide receiver, a Philadelphia Eagle, and a young, exciting player with a history of making questionable decisions. A few months from now, he will still be all those things, except maybe a Philadelphia Eagle.

According to Jeff McLane of the Philadelphia Inquirer, it's likely that the Eagles will hit Jackson with the franchise tag (they can't officially do this until Feb. 20), which would pay Jackson a little over $10 million for one season. It would keep Jackson in an Eagles uniform right now, but leaves his long-term Philly future up in the air. The franchise tag, in this case, is really just an indication that the Eagles aren't ready to commit to Jackson long-term.

So why would the Eagles, who were wide receiver deficient for so long, want to part ways with a 25-year-old speed merchant who has led the team in receiving for the last four years?

Well, Jackson has made things complicated. He's not coming off a great year. For the first time since his rookie season, he came up short of 1,000 yards and had only four touchdowns. It's not as simple as just a lack of production, either ? it's the maybe not-so-great decisions Jackson has made that led to that substandard production.

He held out last season, hoping for a contract extension that wasn't coming. He got himself deactivated for a game by missing a team meeting. He drew a huge penalty by tossing a football at a Giants assistant coach. He dropped his share of balls in 2011, which again landed him on the bench.

There's also a history of concussions, including this nasty one in 2010 sustained at the hands of Dunta Robinson.

The Eagles are in a tight spot, and it's decisions like these that shape a franchise for years to come. Jackson wants to be paid like one of the best receivers in the league, but is he that? Is he worth that much of a financial commitment? If you're going to bank on this guy for years to come, you're pretty much taking his word that he can be a model citizen, because he hasn't demonstrated that.

But on the other hand, life might be difficult without him, too. When he's at his best, he changes games. He singlehandedly adds a big-play element to an offense. Would Jeremy Maclin be as effective if he was facing the opposition's top corner every week? Would LeSean McCoy have the same running lanes? Doesn't it behoove an offense to have such a downfield threat with Michael Vick's cannon arm under center?

There's a lot riding on this decision for the Eagles.

Other popular content on the Yahoo! network:
? Randy Moss announces an NFL comeback attempt on his 35th birthday
? Video: Giants' Victor Cruz scores Grammy seat behind Adele
? Y! Finance: Sports jerseys, video games among top 10 counterfeit goods in the U.S.

Source: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/eagles-reportedly-franchise-desean-jackson-181730416.html

BenJarvus Green-Ellis Shonn Greene Chris Gronkowski Ahmard Hall

Whitney Houston performed the greatest national anthem in sports history (video)

Ten days after the United States went to war in the Persian Gulf, Whitney Houston performed the greatest rendition of the Star Spangled Banner in sports history.

On Jan. 27, 1991, Houston took the field at Tampa Stadium prior to Super Bowl XXV to sing the national anthem. The US was at war in Iraq and the game between the New York Giants and Buffalo Bills was serving as a welcome respite from the televised reports of scud bombs and cease fires.

The pop star had recorded the vocal weeks before in a Los Angeles studio and lip-synched the song at the Super Bowl, but few in the crowd of 73,000 or the 110 million watching at home seemed to notice. Houston's gospel-infused performance and her soaring vocals, all set to the patriotic backdrop of flags and flyovers, are the standard against which all anthems are compared. It's as close to perfect as a human voice can get.

The beauty of Houston's version is in her restraint. Other vocalists try to make "The Star-Spangled Banner" their own with unnecessary flourishes and self-indulgent arrangements. Whitney let the song stand on its own. She just sang the heck out of it.

Houston had agreed to sing the song a year earlier, long before most Americans had heard of Kuwait. She�arranged the song with her musical director Ricky Minor, who later became well known for his same role on "American Idol." It went on to become the fastest-selling single in her record label's history and raised over $500,000 for the American Red Cross.

[ Obituary: Whitney Houston dies at the age of 48 ]

"I think it was a time when Americans needed to believe in our country." Houston said later that year. "I remember standing there and looking at all those people, and it was like I could see in their faces the hopes and prayers and fears of the entire country."

The famed singer died Saturday at a Beverly Hills hotel. She was 48.

Other popular content on Yahoo! network:
? Slideshow: Whitney Houston through the years
? Yahoo! Music: Legendary pop icon's impact
? Watch classic Whitney Houston music videos

Source: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/whitney-houston-performed-greatest-national-anthem-sports-history-020851426.html

Tank Johnson Arthur Jones Jason Jones Linval Joseph

Washington mayor says Redskins shouldn?t go after Peyton Manning

Given a quarterback battery that features John Beck and Rex Grossman, it's understandable that fans of the Washington Redskins would be looking with a sharp eye at the Peyton Manning situation in Indianapolis -- a drama that looks more and more like one in which the hero leaves at the end.

Manning wouldn't necessarily be a lead-pipe lock fit for whatever offense Mike and Kyle Shanahan seem to be running these days (we're still not sure what it might be), but the healthy version of the future Hall of Famer would orbit the team's current quarterback class several times over.

[Dan Wetzel: Feud between Peyton Manning and Colts owner gets uglier]

That said, some in the nation's capital aren't convinced that Manning would be the best fit for a team that seems to be in Permanent Rebuilding Mode. Among those opposed are Washington Mayor Vince Gray, who recently told TBD.com that the 'Skins should probably go a different way.

"You know, I think it depends on what role he would play. But I really think the Redskins need a quarterback that they can build with for the future. You know, Andrew Luck is probably going to go to the Colts, but there's Robert Griffin III, and there's a couple other promising quarterbacks that are out there. We've kind of been down this pathway with quarterbacks who've been great but maybe are in the back end of their career, and even if he comes in and plays a year or two, where do we go from there?"

NewsChannel 8's Bruce DuPuyt then asked the mayor if it would be worth a few more bad seasons if the rebuild was done intelligently, around that ideal young quarterback.

"That's exactly the direction I would go. You look at some of the teams that are up-and-coming, I mean, you look at Atlanta, you look at what San Diego did with Philip Rivers ... the 49ers. Every team now that is really moving forward has done it by building with a quarterback of the future."

And with that, Mayor Gray showed more football moxie than most of the people occupying the Redskins' front office over the last decade. We wouldn't worry about it, though -- given their modus operandi, the Shanahans seem more likely to overpay Matt Flynn than to take a flyer on Manning, a quarterback who would demand a certain amount of organizational control.

H/T: DC Sports Bog

Other popular content on the Yahoo! network:
? Athletes erupt with tweets after Jeremy Lin's game-winner
? ACC spring football: Clemson among those with work ahead
? The Week: Five reasons Rick Santorum's GOP surge won't last

Source: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/washington-d-c-mayor-says-redskins-shouldn-t-153831709.html

Carnell Williams DeAngelo Williams Keiland Williams Ricky Williams

We?ll see how Brandon Jacobs? football skills translate to the squared circle

Following in the legendary footsteps of Adam "Pacman" Jones, New York Giants running back Brandon Jacobs will be in a TNA wrestling ring Monday night.

It won't air until Thursday night, but the television taping takes place Monday night in Orlando. Here's more from Alex Marvez at Fox Sports:

The 6-foot-4, 264-pound Jacobs is expected to have a confrontation with TNA star and 1996 U.S. Olympic gold-medalist wrestler Kurt Angle. Jacobs won't work an actual match but there may be some degree of physicality that wouldn't violate his NFL contract.

If you'll recall, last year after winning the Super Bowl, Green Bay Packers linebacker Clay Matthews did something similar with the WWE. He was a special guest referee as Edge retained his World Heavyweight Championship over Dolph Ziggler.

Originally, the plan was for Jason Pierre-Paul to do the TNA appearance, but Marvez says he backed out due to "exhaustion." Which is a wise move. Because when you're in the ring with a force like Kurt Angle, you better be on your toes and keep your head on a swivel.

Source: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/ll-see-brandon-jacobs-football-skills-translate-squared-192919630.html

Trevor Laws Damione Lewis

We?ll see how Brandon Jacobs? football skills translate to the squared circle

Following in the legendary footsteps of Adam "Pacman" Jones, New York Giants running back Brandon Jacobs will be in a TNA wrestling ring Monday night.

It won't air until Thursday night, but the television taping takes place Monday night in Orlando. Here's more from Alex Marvez at Fox Sports:

The 6-foot-4, 264-pound Jacobs is expected to have a confrontation with TNA star and 1996 U.S. Olympic gold-medalist wrestler Kurt Angle. Jacobs won't work an actual match but there may be some degree of physicality that wouldn't violate his NFL contract.

If you'll recall, last year after winning the Super Bowl, Green Bay Packers linebacker Clay Matthews did something similar with the WWE. He was a special guest referee as Edge retained his World Heavyweight Championship over Dolph Ziggler.

Originally, the plan was for Jason Pierre-Paul to do the TNA appearance, but Marvez says he backed out due to "exhaustion." Which is a wise move. Because when you're in the ring with a force like Kurt Angle, you better be on your toes and keep your head on a swivel.

Source: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/ll-see-brandon-jacobs-football-skills-translate-squared-192919630.html

Corey Williams Dan Williams Jamal Williams Kevin Williams

Report: Chad Ochocinco will become Chad Johnson once again

It appears as if the NFL's Ochocinco era is over, and it has ended with a whimper. Chad Ochocinco claims that this summer, he will return to legally being known as Chad Johnson.

The change is being reported by TMZ and by Ochocinco himself, so the sources are about equally reliable. Here's what TMZ says:

Say goodbye to Chad Ochocinco ... the Patriots star is telling friends, he plans to change his last name BACK to Johnson in time for his wedding this summer -- because he doesn't want his wife to have a made-up last name.

Ocho's wedding to his "Basketball Wives" fiancee Evelyn Lozada is set for July in Florida -- and sources tell TMZ, the wide receiver plans to legally change his last name back to the one he was born with before he ties the knot.

And here's what Chad had to say on Twitter:

I was hoping they'd go for a hyphenated last name. "OCHOCINCO-LOZADA" would look pretty good on the back of a jersey.

Ocho has been Ocho since the summer of 2008, even though he didn't start wearing the number in the NFL until 2009. He Ocho'd for two seasons in Cincinnati and one in New England, where he was largely (OK, completely) ineffective. He had just 15 catches all season and one in the Super Bowl.

More sports news from the Yahoo! Sports Minute:

Other popular content on the Yahoo! network:
? Terrell Owens is still clinging to the NFL dream
? Is Knicks phenom Jeremy Lin the NBA's version of Tim Tebow?
? Y! News video: Seven-year-old girl fights off abductor in Walmart

Source: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/report-chad-ochocinco-become-chad-johnson-once-again-203938755.html

Trent Edwards Brett Favre A.J. Feeley Ryan Fitzpatrick

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Peyton Manning?s face on all 32 NFL logos

This is Manning Face. It's an expression made over the course of an NFL game by either Peyton or Eli Manning that suggests:

a) the quarterback can't believe the incompetent fools who fill out their respective roster.

b) a 9-year-old who recently learned that he will not be getting ice cream for dessert.

Manning Face has been a longtime favorite of the Internet crowd that detests almost everything else. Now, with Peyton's impending free agency (?), a talented gentleman named Dave Rappoccio has imagined what Manning Face would look like if superimposed into every single NFL logo. The results are predictably amazing.

The same way one can't describe the beauty of the "Mona Lisa," the greatness of the Manning Face transcends conventional critique.

Go see all 32 logos here. Enjoy them. Savor them. Live them.

Our six favorites:

More sports news from the Yahoo! Sports Minute:

Source: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/peyton-manning-face-32-nfl-logos-190920871.html

Roy Miller Earl Mitchell Fili Moala C.J. Mosley

West Ham against Southampton is more bare-knuckle than beauty pageant | Simon Burnton

Local beauty queens due at Upton Park but match could decide Championship title and a thriller is in store

Fans at Upton Park for Tuesday night's match between West Ham and Southampton will as an extra bonus get to see two local models who between them have been named Miss Commonwealth International, Miss Galaxy UK, Miss Galaxy International and Miss Essex. The two teams can only dream of being so garlanded.

It still seems likely that one of them will end the season as champions, but the race to that goal is turning out to be more bare-knuckle fight than beauty pageant. And if Southampton started the season with a cocksure catwalk strut ? since a 3-1 win over Leeds on the opening day they have never been out of the top two, and have mostly been the top one ? more recently they have developed a worrying limp. Saturday's 2-0 win over Burnley was just their second league success since Boxing Day.

Having at one point been five points clear at the top of the division, by the end of November Southampton had averaged 2.2 points and 2.2 goals per game, conceding 1.1. But in 10 games from the start of December until last week they won exactly one point per game, still conceding on average 1.1 goals but now scoring just 0.9. Then they conceded a 92nd-minute goal to get knocked out of the FA Cup at home by Millwall.

Thanks to their early-season successes the Saints remain within the promotion places, just a single point behind West Ham having played a game more. But on current form they will not be there long: Birmingham, 16 points behind them at the start of December, are now just five points away with a game in hand. Blackpool and Hull have each turned a 15-point deficit into a gap of just six.

Nigel Adkins, the Southampton manager, downplayed the depressing statistics. "You can spin it whichever way you can spin it. We led the Championship for over four months and West Ham have clawed us back and gone top, but if we win the game then we go back above them," he said. "It's swings and roundabouts whichever way you look at it."

But Dave Merrington, the former Southampton manager who now works on their matches as a summariser for BBC Radio Solent, says the club's season is at a critical stage. "When you've got a five-point lead, you can have a couple of bad results and still be up there. You're not too worried about a the odd match," he says. "But when you have a wobbly period like Saints have all that starts to change. Now they are seriously under pressure. I don't think Southampton can afford any slip-ups any more."

In could be that their performance on Saturday, against a side with the division's third-best away record, proves to be key. "When you lose at home like Saints did against Millwall, it can have a detrimental effect on the dressing-room in terms of team spirit. What concerned me was the next game," says Merrington. "But in fairness I thought they were terrific on Saturday. And that's set up what I would call a classic at Upton Park. With West Ham having overtaken Southampton to go top, everything is set up for an absolutely cracking match."

Both sides will feature unfamiliar strikers: Saturday saw Southampton give a first start to their �1.8m January purchase from Doncaster, Billy Sharp. On Tuesday night Nicky Maynard, a �2m arrival from Bristol City, should make his debut for West Ham, whose captain Kevin Nolan is suspended. Maynard's arrival should offer some encouragement to the fans whose discontented mutterings about the team's negative playing style, particularly at home, have accompanied West Ham's ascent to the top. "Any criticism of the way we play doesn't make any sense to me," their manager, Sam Allardyce, said last week. "All this team did before was lose."

Their preparations for tonight's game were aided by the postponement of Saturday's visit to Peterborough (despite 200 fans turning up at 7am in temperatures of -11C to clear the London Road pitch of snow). And if Southampton aren't fatigued a look at their away record, just the 11th best in the division, could induce an ugly headache on its own. "If they can improve that away record they should be OK," says Merrington. "I think if they could win tonight, that would really be a confidence booster. What West Ham will not be able to do is stand off Southampton in midfield, like Burnley did. They've got very, very good technical players who can knock the ball around and interchange [positionally] very well. If West Ham do that they will be in trouble."

If they don't Southampton could be: should the night go badly for Adkins West Ham would be four points clear with a game in hand with Birmingham, having also played one game fewer, just two points behind and closing fast. For that to happen Blues ? the division's form team having won six, drawn three and not lost at all since Christmas ? will have to beat sixth-placed Hull at home. "I think we're within striking distance," Blues' midfielder Wade Elliott said. "We've managed to move ourselves into a decent position and hopefully in the second half of the season we can come strong."

Southampton's long stay at the top, and the more recent eminence of the pre-season favourites, has lent this season's Championship an air of stability. It remains to be seen just how deceptive that was.


guardian.co.uk © 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2012/feb/14/west-ham-southampton-championship

Laurence Maroney Chris Massey Ryan Mathews Reagan Mauia

The Giants won the ?Brain Bowl,? too

The New York Giants beat the New England Patriots in the Super Bowl this past Sunday not just by being better between the lines but, according to Dr. John F. Murray, by being better between their ears.

The Mental Performance Index (MPI) was developed by Dr. Murray, a south Florida-based sports psychologist who has been called by the Washington Post the "Freud of Football." MPI shows how closely a football team comes to achieving perfection in a game across multiple domains. The system ranks a team on a scale of .000 to 1.000 -- .500 is roughly average and .600 is extraordinary. No Super Bowl-winning team has ever topped .600 in the MPI rating.

According to Murray, who authored The Mental Performance Index: Ranking the Best Teams in Super Bowl History, the Giants' MPI for the Super Bowl came out to �.522, compared to the Patriots, who managed a .500 ranking for the game.

"This game was played at a higher than average level for a Super Bowl game. Overall, the Giants clearly outperformed the Patriots in terms of total team performance, so we know that the better performing team in fact won the game," Dr. Murray said. "Justice was realized! Over 90 percent of the time, the higher-performing team will win a football game as reflected on the MPI total score, so the theory that performance wins games is indeed valid."

What MPI does is factor in overall consistency as part of its formula and very rarely does a team with a lower MPI lose the Super Bowl. The last time was in 2005 when the Pittsburgh Steelers had a lower MPI than the Seattle Seahawks, who lost the game.

Through statistical analysis, Dr. Murray has created a balance system that values plays based not only on their outcome but also their impact. In essence, MPI weighs in a comprehensive, balanced fashion each team play as it objectively looks at how the 11 players as a unit performs. It is the truest way to measure how in sync a team is not just physically but also mentally.

Adjustments are made based on the observed mental performance. More than raw yardage or basic statistics, captured within this number is the pressure and significance of the moment and the execution of the team in the moment. It requires an expert human being to evaluate the moment and the significance of the play in the scheme of all four quarters. Field position, clock time and score are all factors that must be weighed.

It is in the pressure packed moments that this game was won according to MPI. Given that the Giants won on their last drive of the game, this shouldn't necessarily be a surprise, but the disparity between the two teams in the clutch according to MPI is shocking.

"The main advantage for the Giants came in pressure situations, as the Giants outperformed the Patriots in all pressure situations combined by a .569 to .461 margin,"�Dr. Murray said. "But whereas the Patriots offense in pressure situations was identical to the Giants defense as both teams scored .536, it was when the Giants were on offense that the greatest difference occurred.

"The Giants offense dominated the Patriots defense in pressure moments by a wide margin of .591 to .417."

Related Super Bowl content from Yahoo! Sports:

Source: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/giants-won-brain-bowl-too-210507047.html

Chris Massey Ryan Mathews Reagan Mauia Le Ron McClain

West Ham against Southampton is more bare-knuckle than beauty pageant | Simon Burnton

Local beauty queens due at Upton Park but match could decide Championship title and a thriller is in store

Fans at Upton Park for Tuesday night's match between West Ham and Southampton will as an extra bonus get to see two local models who between them have been named Miss Commonwealth International, Miss Galaxy UK, Miss Galaxy International and Miss Essex. The two teams can only dream of being so garlanded.

It still seems likely that one of them will end the season as champions, but the race to that goal is turning out to be more bare-knuckle fight than beauty pageant. And if Southampton started the season with a cocksure catwalk strut ? since a 3-1 win over Leeds on the opening day they have never been out of the top two, and have mostly been the top one ? more recently they have developed a worrying limp. Saturday's 2-0 win over Burnley was just their second league success since Boxing Day.

Having at one point been five points clear at the top of the division, by the end of November Southampton had averaged 2.2 points and 2.2 goals per game, conceding 1.1. But in 10 games from the start of December until last week they won exactly one point per game, still conceding on average 1.1 goals but now scoring just 0.9. Then they conceded a 92nd-minute goal to get knocked out of the FA Cup at home by Millwall.

Thanks to their early-season successes the Saints remain within the promotion places, just a single point behind West Ham having played a game more. But on current form they will not be there long: Birmingham, 16 points behind them at the start of December, are now just five points away with a game in hand. Blackpool and Hull have each turned a 15-point deficit into a gap of just six.

Nigel Adkins, the Southampton manager, downplayed the depressing statistics. "You can spin it whichever way you can spin it. We led the Championship for over four months and West Ham have clawed us back and gone top, but if we win the game then we go back above them," he said. "It's swings and roundabouts whichever way you look at it."

But Dave Merrington, the former Southampton manager who now works on their matches as a summariser for BBC Radio Solent, says the club's season is at a critical stage. "When you've got a five-point lead, you can have a couple of bad results and still be up there. You're not too worried about a the odd match," he says. "But when you have a wobbly period like Saints have all that starts to change. Now they are seriously under pressure. I don't think Southampton can afford any slip-ups any more."

In could be that their performance on Saturday, against a side with the division's third-best away record, proves to be key. "When you lose at home like Saints did against Millwall, it can have a detrimental effect on the dressing-room in terms of team spirit. What concerned me was the next game," says Merrington. "But in fairness I thought they were terrific on Saturday. And that's set up what I would call a classic at Upton Park. With West Ham having overtaken Southampton to go top, everything is set up for an absolutely cracking match."

Both sides will feature unfamiliar strikers: Saturday saw Southampton give a first start to their �1.8m January purchase from Doncaster, Billy Sharp. On Tuesday night Nicky Maynard, a �2m arrival from Bristol City, should make his debut for West Ham, whose captain Kevin Nolan is suspended. Maynard's arrival should offer some encouragement to the fans whose discontented mutterings about the team's negative playing style, particularly at home, have accompanied West Ham's ascent to the top. "Any criticism of the way we play doesn't make any sense to me," their manager, Sam Allardyce, said last week. "All this team did before was lose."

Their preparations for tonight's game were aided by the postponement of Saturday's visit to Peterborough (despite 200 fans turning up at 7am in temperatures of -11C to clear the London Road pitch of snow). And if Southampton aren't fatigued a look at their away record, just the 11th best in the division, could induce an ugly headache on its own. "If they can improve that away record they should be OK," says Merrington. "I think if they could win tonight, that would really be a confidence booster. What West Ham will not be able to do is stand off Southampton in midfield, like Burnley did. They've got very, very good technical players who can knock the ball around and interchange [positionally] very well. If West Ham do that they will be in trouble."

If they don't Southampton could be: should the night go badly for Adkins West Ham would be four points clear with a game in hand with Birmingham, having also played one game fewer, just two points behind and closing fast. For that to happen Blues ? the division's form team having won six, drawn three and not lost at all since Christmas ? will have to beat sixth-placed Hull at home. "I think we're within striking distance," Blues' midfielder Wade Elliott said. "We've managed to move ourselves into a decent position and hopefully in the second half of the season we can come strong."

Southampton's long stay at the top, and the more recent eminence of the pre-season favourites, has lent this season's Championship an air of stability. It remains to be seen just how deceptive that was.


guardian.co.uk © 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2012/feb/14/west-ham-southampton-championship

Ryan Sims Le Kevin Smith Shaun Smith Ndamukong Suh

Giants to be honored with commemorative NY license plate; some would rather see a 9/11 plate

If you're a New York driver, you will be able to get a handsome license plate honoring the 2012 Super Bowl champion New York Giants. There is currently no option, though, for you to get a license plate honoring victims and first responders of the September 11, 2001 tragedy.

This has some New York residents and politicians unhappy. Jim Tedisco, a Republican New York State assemblyman, had this to say. Via the AP:

"I'm happy that the Giants won the Super Bowl as much as the next New Yorker, but who are the real heroes our state should first be celebrating with distinctive plates, the athletes on the gridiron or the first responders and the people who lost their lives on Sept. 11?"

If the question is which group of people most deserve respect and praise, obviously, it's the 9/11 victims and first responders. If license plate availability is how you choose to measure how much respect someone's getting, then yes, I'd imagine this would seem like an injustice.

So why can't New York just also make a commemorative 9/11 license plate? Because in 2004, the state issued a moratorium on new license plates because they had over 300 designs in existence. So now, they can't make any new ones. This Giants plate slides past because they say it's a reworking of a past plate that honored a previous Giants Super Bowl win.

I'm all for honoring 9/11 victims and first responders as much as we can, even today, 10 years after the fact. A license plate seems like a trivial issue, though. No one's saying that football players are more valuable than policemen or firemen. If you'd like to have a 9/11 remembrance on your car, I'm pretty sure there are options available for you.

Any time spent railing against a Giants license plate could maybe be better spent volunteering or donating to the causes one finds more important.

Related Super Bowl content from Yahoo! Sports:

Source: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/giants-honored-commemorative-ny-license-plate-rather-see-230202276.html

Charlie Batch John Beck Kyle Boller Todd Bouman